This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ahmed Abu-Abed
ahmed at tamkien.com
Sun Jan 9 13:01:02 CET 2011
My suggestion was to develop a best practice for consumer CPE specifications based on existing IETF standards/drafts. Regards, -Ahmed From: Marco Hogewoning Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 1:22 PM To: Ahmed Abu-Abed Cc: kzorba at otenet.gr ; ipv6-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment On 9 jan 2011, at 05:40, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote: > Good point, and having a Consumer CPE spec as a RIPE standard would help for last mile access requirements. RIPE-501 only aimed for government and enterprise deployments. My personal preference would be to keep pointing to the work done in the IETF. The problem with standards is, there usually are too many. Adding another one will only lead to more confusion, let alone the time it will take to get consensus. Grtx, MarcoH -- "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20110109/28aac93a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" comment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]