[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question tocommunity - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Tue Dec 27 13:40:54 CET 2011
* Jan Zorz: > On 12/27/11 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Most devices use TLS. >> >> I agree with dropping IPsec from the document completely, indepedent of >> device type. > So you suggest not mentioning IPsec in any form at all in whole > document? Am I reading this correctly? Yes. Even if we could achieve agreement on a subset of devices where it's supposed to make sense, "IPsec" is really a catchphrase for a set of related protocols, so anyone who actually needs some of it needs to ask for it explicitly anyway. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question tocommunity - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]