[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Fri Dec 23 23:16:45 CET 2011
On 12/23/11 5:30 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > Jan, > > Let's be realistic (and the best quality of RIPE-501++ is to be > realistic and 'down to the ground'): very few IPv6-nodes do IPsec... > So, let's remove this requirement and make it optional (RFC 6434 > clearly shows the path). > > Going in holiday mode: do you use SSH or telnet+IPsec ? :-) I see your point :) so, +1 for all optional. What others think? And additional question: should we request IPsec-v3 or v2? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]