[ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Fri Dec 23 10:06:12 CET 2011
* Jan Zorz: > The authors of RIPE-501 are finalizing the last comments from previous > last call and would like community input for what to do with IPsec. > All authors feel that IPsec should be a mandatory requirement for all > devices although due to technical limitations, for mobile devices it > will be optional. Shouldn't it be the other way round? Mobile devices are more likely to need VPN services than other kinds of devices. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE-501 replacement document - IPsec question to community - we need your input.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]