[ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Fri Sep 3 11:12:37 CEST 2010
On 1 Sep 2010, at 14:34, Emilio Madaio wrote: > You can find the full proposal at: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html Hello everyone Do we need this new status attribute ? If I have a /32, and I assign a /48 to be a dsl-pool, with which to make end-user assignments of /56, then that /48 is already assigned isn't it ? Giving a customer a /56 then makes one slice used, but it's not a sub-assignment is it ? In the way that if I mark a /24 from a /21 of v4 as a dsl-pool, then I am not implying here that there are 256 sub-assignments ? Sorry if I have missed something.. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]