[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Us
us at sweet-sorrow.com
Tue Nov 9 09:39:20 CET 2010
On 11/09/2010 09:34 AM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 9.11.10 2:29, Marc Blanchet wrote: > >> I know (and have been helping providers to deploy 6PE and 6VPE). My >> point is to >> make it "mandatory" is the issue. > > The correct interpretation is "mandatory if functionality required" :) > > If you want to run 6PE or 6VPE, then it's mandatory that equipment > supports it. > > Unconditionally mandatory are RFC lines, that does not contain "if > required by". > > Does this make sense? > > /jan > > I think this is a bit redundant. It reads as "if you need, you must have it". Us
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]