[ipv6-wg] "IPv6 Ripeness" measurements on RIPE Labs

On Mon, 3 May 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
>> http://labs.ripe.net/content/ipv6-ripeness
>
> You're asking for ideas for the "5th star".  Some random thoughts...
>
> - have IPv6 transport (with addresses from their own prefix) to all/some of
>   the DNS servers that the IPv6 reverse zone is delegated to

For the purposes of automation, I'd say "at least one of the (reverse) 
DNS servers for the prefix answers to a DNS query over v6" should be 
sufficient, and better than the two first alternatives.

While there may be some small relevance whether the DNS server is from 
another prefix, it would result in false negatives in the cases where 
a (somehow defined) organisation is using multiple prefixes (e.g. due 
to mergers etc.).  That would be confusing.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings