[ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Thu Jan 14 18:23:52 CET 2010
Hi, Thus wrote David Kessens (david.kessens at nsn.com): > At the same time, I don't believe we should overregulate and loose one > of the key benefits of our loosely organized community. Therefore, my > personal preference would be to formulate a set of principles that we > need to follow to appoint chair people while the actual implementation > can vary depending on the position that needs to be filled. Question is, ought it be an appointment (eg by the current chair(s)), or a vote? and if a vote, who ought to be eligible to be a voter? People who attend RIPE meetings, or including all 'mere' mailing list members? Or even wider? In this case, "who" has a lot of influence on "how" (eg, for the latter and case something like a Usenet style vote might be ok, for the first just lift hands at the next meeting). Does anyone feel a need for a secret vote? they are much harder to do unless you trust the vote taker absolutely. regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] working group co-chair(s)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]