[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Mon Feb 8 13:45:50 CET 2010
On Thursday 04 February 2010 00:44:05 David Kessens wrote: Hello all, as a relatively newcomer to this community, I would like to learn more about the duties and responsibilities of a WG [co]chair. As I understand it, the appointment procedures are quite informal with all the merits and shortcomings that come with it. Having said this, I have the impression that 3 people are better than one or two. I have met both candidates, read their comments for the WG and I support them both. I also think it would be a good idea for other people to come forward as well. The migration to IPv6 needs all the effort and support it can get, having active and expanding WG / forums such as this. Regards, Kostas Zorbadelos > > I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me > to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both > candidates as co-chairs. > > Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit > more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a > position yet on this topic. > > Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you > whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you > have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one > co-chair is enough. > > ---
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]