[ipv6-wg] Re: RFC 1918 in "production networks"

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: RFC 1918 in "production networks"
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: RFC 1918 in "production networks"

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dmitry Burkov dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Fri Feb 5 06:30:00 CET 2010

On 05.02.10 3:02, Shane Kerr wrote:

> --
> Shane
>
> p.s. Note that 1.1.1.1 and 1.2.3.4 chosen as example addresses in honor
>       of this research: http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>
>    
Sorry - but all this discussion reminded me about current situation too 
(http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18 )
Such vpn solution/services as h a m a c h i, etc (easily can be fpound) 
intensifely use 5/8, 1/8 and may be some others /8s.

Dima

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: RFC 1918 in "production networks"
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: RFC 1918 in "production networks"

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]