[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
García Fernández, Fernando
Fernando.Garcia at tecnocom.es
Wed Feb 3 23:56:28 CET 2010
After reading their own introduction and knowing both candidates from several RIPE meetings, I give my support to both of them to be co-chairs. I think and odd number is good as break in discussions. El 03/02/2010, a las 23:44, David Kessens escribió: > > All, > > The call for candidates for co-chairs of the IPv6 working group has > resulted in two candidates. See below for their names and a link to the > mailing list with their motivations and plans for the working group: > > Shane Kerr > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00038.html > > Marco Hogewoning > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00041.html > > This brings us to the next step in our process: > > 1) The nominees are given a chance to determine whether they want to > be considered or withdraw as they decided that there are other > good candidates already available > > 2) The community may express opinions that could help the > candidates to come to a decision on whether they want to > be continued to be considered as a candidate > - the community may consider appointing more than one co-chair > in case of several good candidates > > Let's take until the end of Mon Feb 8, 2010 in a timezone of your > choice to determine an outcome for both 1) and 2). > > I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me > to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both > candidates as co-chairs. > > Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit > more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a > position yet on this topic. > > Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you > whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you > have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one > co-chair is enough. > > Note that this period is for open discussion and that it is perfectly > fine to do alternate proposals. > > Our objective is to see if we can come to a consensus which allows us > to avoid more complex ways of making a selection such as a vote. > > After our discussion period is over, I will determine if there is > enough basis to do a Last Call to confirm a selection decision as > determined from our discussion phase, or whether we perhaps need a bit > more time for discussion or that we will have to resort to organizing > a vote. > > I hope this helps, > > David Kessens > --- > -- Tecnocom Fernando García Fernández D.G. Integración de Redes y Sistemas Josefa Valcarcel, 26 Edificio Merrimack III Madrid - 28027 Tel. Fijo: 901900900 ext 40383 Fax: (+34) 914313240 Tel. Móvil: (+34) 649428591 E-mail: fernando.garcia at tecnocom.es http://www.tecnocom.es
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]