[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Wed Feb 3 11:13:40 CET 2010
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 05:58:01 pm Martin Millnert wrote: > Given 1), it makes a lot of sense to put 2) + 3) on a > separate SSID. Give it a well-descriptive name and > that's it... Problem solved! Attendees can do testing on > their *own* terms, which is bound to make them happier. This is what we do, shall be doing and have done at a regional meeting in Asia-Pac. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100203/8defe8e8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]