[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Burkov
dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Tue Feb 2 19:43:48 CET 2010
On 02.02.10 19:07, Gert Doering wrote: > > (despite the religious aspects, there's a purely practical aspect - if > you force RIPE attendees into RFC1918 space, you're going to kill VPN > connects for those poor souls that have a home network in the *same* > RFC1918 address range. Which will break almost all VPN clients out there.) > Gert, seems you dramatize the situation - there are more issues - to be honest. The situations can be more complex. But I don't see any specific differences with access to corporate intranets and still had no problem in such mixed enviroments using appropriative tools for years. Dima > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]