[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Tue Feb 2 17:39:53 CET 2010

Shane Kerr wrote:
> But the idea that no production networks can use RFC 1918 is a bit
> disturbing, because in 2 years or so there won't be any IPv4 addresses
> left, and people will be forced to use RFC 1918 addresses. Does that
> mean there won't be any IPv4 production networks in 2013?

Shane,

Please, don't push the CGN(or LSN) idea any further. NAT-ing the whole ISP 
networks would permanently kill end2end paradigm.

I don't want to see my whole city or even country to operate in RFC1918 address 
space behind one big NAT in near future.

Sorry, I agree with Gert. :)

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]