[ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Feb 2 15:31:57 CET 2010
On 02/02/2010 14:18, James Aldridge wrote: > Reading the minutes of the IPv6 WG at RIPE 59 I read: >> David asked the audience if the IPv6 Hour should be rerun at future >> meetings.. There is consensus that it should be. > Rob Blokzijl has asked that we treat the RIPE Meeting network as a > production network. This effectively means that we won't be turning off > the dual-stack network for another "IPv6 Hour". [...] > Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you. A good position, James. There is a difference between advocacy and forcing v6 down peoples' throats. Proving the dual-stack model works is important enough. Maybe we can force dual stack down people's throats by forcing a registration portal that was only available via v6, once complete you had access to the production dual stack network ? ;-) Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]