[ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thomas Narten narten at us.ibm.com
Tue Dec 14 02:14:39 CET 2010

> A) A lot of people (including RFC 3177) claim every residential user
>  should get a /48. A few recent opinions are collected here:

RFC 3177 is old, and will hopefully soon be replaced. The current
update to it is:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3177bis-end-sites-00

That document recently completed IETF LC (with no significant
opposition) and is being processed by the IESG.

Thomas

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]