[ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)

I'm probably just totally confused, but anyway:

A) A lot of people (including RFC 3177) claim every residential user should get a /48. A few recent opinions are collected here:

http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/12/how-much-ipv6-address-space-should.html

B) The ripe-481-draft says "However, all /48 assignments to End Sites are required to be registered either by the LIR or its subordinate ISPs ..." which means that a LIR or an ISP would have to register every residential user.

What am I missing?

Thanks,
Ivan Pepelnjak
www.ioshints.info

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of
> Emilio Madaio
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:45 PM
> To: policy-announce at ripe.net
> Cc: ipv6-wg at ripe.net; db-wg at ripe.net; address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements
> for IPv6 End User Assignments)
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> 
> The IPv6 WG Chairs have decided that the proposal 2010-06 is ready for
> a 2 week Review Phase. Marco Hogewoning did not participate to the
> decision as he is a co-proposer.
> 
> Following the feedback received, the draft documents for this proposal
> have been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this
> proposal has also been published.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html
> 
> and the draft documents at:
> 
>     http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-481-draft2010-06.html
>     http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2010-06.html
> 
> 
> 
> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
> to ipv6-wg at ripe.net  before 27 December 2010.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC