[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

On Sep 25, 2009, at 7:44 AM, S.P.Zeidler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thus wrote Kostas Zorbadelos (kzorba at otenet.gr):
>
>>> its terms of reference. For instance, how does the RIPE IPv6 WG
>>> differ from ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de ?
>>
>> I read that "IPv6 discussion should naturally move to wider forums".
>> Can anyone mention any such forums active right now? Is
>> ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de such a forum?
>
> Not speaking authoritatively, but since noone else seems to want to  
> pick
> it up: ipv6-ops at lists.cluenet.de is for operational issues in IPv6,
> like eg "Why is the shortest path to my next door neighbour suddenly
> crossing the pacific, twice?" or "Can you see my prefix?" or
> "Announcement of prefix XX is doing funny things", as well as
> "Could a IPv6-clueful person from AS YY please contact me offlist?".
> It is not limited to the RIPE region but intended as a nanog equiv for
> IPv6 networks. Of course, topic shift happens. :)

Is this a normal mailman subscription site ? Is there a subscription  
page ?

Regards
Marshall

>
> regards,
> 	spz
> -- 
> spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
>
>