[ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Us
us at sweet-sorrow.com
Fri Sep 25 08:18:02 CEST 2009
Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:44:38PM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >> Even if open ports wouldn't be an issue, think of: >> >> - inbound connections (people using VOIP) >> - VPN to connect back home (meeting is still providing fixed IP for >> that purpose) >> - CPU load >> - traceability (Pentagon got hacked by somebody at RIPE-XX) > > Which is the point, isn't it? "NAT BAD! IPv6 GOOD!". > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster Hm... this attitude is (I belive) registered to Jan Zorz... It's all he talks about... Then again, let's do it on a pre-set date and just flick the switch :) Ragnar Belial Us
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Simulation of the future IPv4 world at RIPE meetings?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]