[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Tue Sep 15 19:15:28 CEST 2009

> However, none of that seems to be happening now. If it is, it is
> happening "off-camera", certainly not on the mailing list. Maybe that is
> okay, given the working group seems to be chartered to merely keep track
> of what is going on. But honestly, I don't see the point. Surely we can
> find something better to do with our time than see another chart showing
> IPv6 traffic rise 20% (*)?

Shane, +1. Totally agree.

Jan Zorz, go6.si

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]