[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Oct 26 21:45:14 CET 2009
On 26.10.09 20:36, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Hi Fergas. > >> What if someone has objections to the tweaked proposals, are you saying >> that it is too late for them to comment on new text? > > Absolutely not. > > Regards, Jan > Fergas suggested me offlist to clarify this a bit. My view of how it should be done is: Shane proposed charter-01, strong support was shown and some comments came in. Shane needs to compile charter-02 and gather more comments (if any). If comments, charter-03 should be done, and so on until we get the consensus. That's how work gets done. Everything else is just chatting and ego fighting. Somebody mentioned hostility; I'm not, not even close, I just give short answers sometimes for some people. ... and I strongly agree with Sanders's today answer. Off until -02. Have fun, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]