[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Oct 26 19:21:12 CET 2009
> And now with my working group chair hat on ;-): > > It is helpful if you post such comments (negative as well as positive) > on the list so that people have a chance to show agreement or > disagreement, or suggestions for improvement. Eg. it is much easier > for Shane to know whether a particular direction makes sense if he > knows that there is support from more than one person. David hi. Normally I would agree with you, I also think public discussion is important. In this case we saw massive support for Shane's first charter and also support for few suggestions for modifications. Shane just needs to tweak a bit his text and we might get the charter with full consensus in a very short period of time. I think no more data collecting is needed on this and that's why I agreed on helping Shane with tweaking the text. With respect, Jan Zorz
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]