[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marco Hogewoning marcoh at marcoh.net
Thu Nov 26 15:13:05 CET 2009

> Just to drop a bit of bait into this lively discussion :-9 - we could
> actually afford to give every organization that reasonably claims to
> serve IP connectivity to more than 1000 customers a /24.  There's 10
> million /24s inside FP 001.  All in all, the RIRs have about 20.000
> members today - 1/500th of that.


I think I'm with Remco here, there is a way around it and it might be  
worth adding something on how to do that to the drafr.

I don't think 'it's messy' or 'we have enough space' are strong  
arguments to simply give everybody a /24, let's not forget there was  
that day once when a /8 was the default assignment size.

Groet,

MarcoH

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]