[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
joao damas
joao at bondis.org
Sat Nov 7 07:53:45 CET 2009
coming in late due to travel but wanted to add a "me too!" to previous support for this text Joao On 4 Nov 2009, at 11:09, Shane Kerr wrote: > All, > > I've tried to combine all of the input and comments and produce a > version of the text which hopefully includes all suggestions. > Hopefully > it is not too long: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > IPv6 is the next-generation IP protocol. The IPv6 working group exists > to promote IPv6 adoption. > > The working group activities may be anything useful in helping people > to deploy IPv6, and to manage IPv4/IPv6 co-existence. These activities > include: > > * Outreach > * Education > * Sharing deployment experiences > * Discussing operational issues > > The working group will co-operate within the networking industry and > without, to share resources and combine efforts. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Changes: > > * The 2nd paragraph was updated as per Sander's input. > * I took David's point and removed "co-operation" as a activity, > since as he indicated it is quite vague without the > explanation. > Instead I added the sentence at the end there. The idea is to > make sure that we note that we have a goal of not duplicating > work, but rather use the good stuff that other IPv6 and non- > IPv6 > organizations have done. If this doesn't make sense in the > charter, we can of course leave it out. > * I added David's activity about sharing deployment experiences - > it seems to make sense. > * I added a slightly modified activity based on David's last new > one. His was "propose solutions for operational issues". I > would > rather see this as a more general discussion of operational > issues - presumably solutions will be proposed where > appropriate. If we want to focus on solutions, then we can > revert to David's idea about proposing solutions. > > I think we are very close, and hopefully people are happy with this > one. > I don't have any objection to further modifications, although I am > looking forward to moving past the rechartering and getting to some > planning of what to do with the new-found working group super- > powers! :) > > -- > Shane >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Announcement: RIPE NCC Training Courses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]