[ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
S.P.Zeidler
spz at serpens.de
Wed Nov 4 18:14:39 CET 2009
Hi Shane, Thus wrote Shane Kerr (shane at time-travellers.org): > Hopefully > it is not too long: 14 lines.. that should fit most terminals in one page ;-P > * I added a slightly modified activity based on David's last new > one. His was "propose solutions for operational issues". I would > rather see this as a more general discussion of operational > issues - presumably solutions will be proposed where > appropriate. If we want to focus on solutions, then we can > revert to David's idea about proposing solutions. I think 'discussion' is better than focussing on 'solutions' only, because sometimes you don't have a solution, but only the choice which bear trap to stick your foot in, and knowing there is such a trade ahead can be very valuable indeed. In short, I like. :) regards, spz -- spz at serpens.de (S.P.Zeidler)
- Previous message (by thread): SV: [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]