[ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Mar 17 11:58:04 CET 2009
Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:37:03AM +0100, Peeters, Ralph wrote: > Ripe membership will (basically) give me a /32 per location no matter > the number of users or location? As of today, RIPE membership will give you a single /32, tagged "PA" (to be used for ISP-alike networks and their customers). The proposal 2006-01 is currently in last call. If it passes, you can get one or more /48 networks, tagged "PI" (provider independent, to be used by the requesting organization) from the RIPE NCC. Depending on the size of your individual locations, you might want to consider using a mixed strategy, though - use static space (PI) in the big (and/or multihomed) locations, and provider space (PA) for the smaller offices. Yes, renumbering is work - but injecting extra routes in the global system causes global cost, so the tradeoff should be seriously considered. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]