[address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Hi,

Gert Doering schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>> Two can play the RFC quoting game (2460):
> 
> There's a certain fun value to watch your "I can quote more interesting
> things from the RFC" game - but:
> 
> ** can we please try to focus on "do we want to issue this resolution, 
> ** and if yes, which words need changing"?

a) seconded, or this tends to get a "ignored by the sane people" thread
like this 240/4 thingy on the NANOG-list...
Please discuss that stuff in private or ask RIPE to open an "Advocacy 
WG" + list.. thanks.

b) there aren't that many change-requeensts (nono, no ITIL...) for the 
wording, are they? Did i miss something in the mess?

-- 
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz                  SLZ-RIPE          slz at baycix.de         =
= Network Operations                                                   =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut                  * PGP public Key on demand *  =
========================================================================