This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Fri Oct 19 11:24:50 CEST 2007

* Iljitsch van Beijnum:

> On 18-okt-2007, at 21:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>>> IPv6 is a software upgrade.
>
>> Including IPsec?  Doubt it, some of the CPUs barely manage to run
>> PPPoE.
>
> Since when are IPv6 routers required to do IPsec processing?

RFC 4294, Section 8.1.

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] AW: [ipv6-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]