[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Tim Streater tim.streater at dante.org.uk
Thu Oct 18 17:34:13 CEST 2007

At 14:39 18/10/2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
>* Tim Streater:
>
> > End users won't require it; they know little about v4 and v6 and only
> > care about their applications working and being able to reach the
> > hosts/sites they want to reach.
>
>Does this reflect your experience with the academic community?  (Just
>curious.)

End users doing v6 testing or testing apps for v6, will obviously know. We must have a number of those in some NRENs that we serve. We have several NREN customers who consistently generate orders of magnitude more v6 traffic than others. Then you have 
the generality of network engineers, who should know :-)

But end-users in general (academic or not) are unlikely to know, seems to me.

-- Tim

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]