[ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Florian Weimer fw at deneb.enyo.de
Thu Oct 18 10:57:34 CEST 2007

* Gert Doering:

> 2) We urge network operators and Internet Service Providers 
> (ISPs) to deploy IPv6 across their networks as soon as possible. 
> This deployment must include providing IPv6 access to End Users 
> and ensuring services are accessible by IPv6.

Shouldn't this paragraph target RIPE members specifically? Or, put
differently, why are end users and software vendors excluded?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] DRAFT: RIPE Community Resolution on IPv4 Depletion and Deployment of IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]