[ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ray Plzak
plzak at arin.net
Tue Jan 2 22:44:16 CET 2007
Hi Tanya, Each of the RIRs publishes statistics everyday regarding their allocations/assignments. These are rather straight forward reports of activity. The RIRs do not publish any analysis this information but rather provide the raw data in a common format that can be used by anyone in the global community to do research and analysis. I was merely suggesting that since there seemed to be a discussion and inferences occurring that it might be interesting to look at a couple of different views. Ray _____ From: Tanya Hinman [mailto:emmiesan at msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:52 PM To: Ray Plzak; 'Iljitsch van Beijnum' Cc: ipv6-wg at ripe.net Subject: RE: [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report Hey there Ray! Are these actually statistics or parameters, and are either available at this time for IPv6 and IPv4? I would be interested in seeing them, especially would like to update my view of how IPv6 is being utilized at this time. Thanks, Tanya _____ > From: plzak at arin.net > To: iljitsch at muada.com; emmiesan at msn.com > CC: ipv6-wg at ripe.net > Subject: RE: [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report > Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:08:33 -0500 > > I would think that an interesting statistic to look at would be the > consumption rates by region and by the top 10 economy/country consumers in > both IPv4 and IPv6. I would also look at the percentage of the allocated > IPv6 resources by region and by the top 10 economy/country consumers. > > Ray > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of > > Iljitsch van Beijnum > > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 5:33 AM > > To: Tanya Hinman > > Cc: ipv6-wg at ripe.net > > Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report > > > > On 1-jan-2007, at 23:53, Tanya Hinman wrote: > > > > > Is the decrease in the percentage of used IPv4 space in the United > > > States of America due to other countries increasing their usage and/ > > > or the return of unused IPv4 space in the United States of America? > > > Just looking at upcoming usage statistics globally. > > > > A year ago, the US held 1324.93 million addresses out of a total of > > 2238.04 million = 59.2% (apparently I rounded off incorrectly with my > > 60% figure). > > > > Yesterday's total is 2407.11 so for the US to maintain its 59.2% it > > would have to hold 1425 million addresses, which is an increase of > > exactly 100 million addresses. But the US didn't get 100 million > > addresses last year, but "only" 41.66 million for a total of 1366.53 > > (56.8%). > > > > So the US keeps growing, and still uses up a quarter of the new > > addresses given out in 2006, but the rest of the world grows faster > > so the US lead is diminishing. > _____ Get into the holiday spirit, chat with Santa on Messenger. Ho-Ho-Ho! <http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/santabot/default.aspx?locale=en-us > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20070102/d0842a0c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]