From cfriacas at fccn.pt Tue Sep 5 15:34:11 2006 From: cfriacas at fccn.pt (Carlos Friacas) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:34:11 +0100 (WEST) Subject: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Benchmarking - Sept'2006 Message-ID: Hello, You can fill in (yet another) survey about IPv6 at: http://surveys.ipv6.eu This survey is part of the European IPv6 Task-Force Steering Commitee's Benchmarking Activity, in the scope of project IST-2-004572-CA, partly funded by the EC. Your cooperation is needed and very welcome! Please also help this message reach the mailboxes of people on your communities, even to those folks which are still far from using IPv6, but who can spare 10 mins to fill this form. This survey is focused on metrics we cannot have input without direct intervention from humans. The outcome of it, plus the data we periodically collect automatically (from several sources) will be worked/aggregated and published on http://www.ipv6.eu Stay tuned! ps: sorry for any duplicate messages. Best Regards, ./Carlos -------------- Wide Area Network (WAN) Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional http://www.fccn.pt "Internet is just routes (191157/571), naming (millions) and... people!" From jordi.palet at consulintel.es Tue Sep 5 16:11:06 2006 From: jordi.palet at consulintel.es (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ) Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 22:11:06 +0800 Subject: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Benchmarking - Sept'2006 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'm not sure if this email is relevant for this mail exploder, but despite that, it seems to be backed up by the European IPv6 Task Force by using the logo (neither the owner of the logo IPRs), which is not true as the European IPv6 Task Force members have never been asked about that. Last, but not least, the survey doesn't include the legal mandatory data protection measures, so I will strongly discourage answering it. Regards, Jordi > De: Carlos Friacas > Responder a: > Fecha: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:34:11 +0100 (WEST) > Para: , , > , > Asunto: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Benchmarking - Sept'2006 > > > Hello, > > You can fill in (yet another) survey about IPv6 at: > > http://surveys.ipv6.eu > > > This survey is part of the European IPv6 Task-Force Steering > Commitee's Benchmarking Activity, in the scope of project > IST-2-004572-CA, partly funded by the EC. > > Your cooperation is needed and very welcome! > > Please also help this message reach the mailboxes of people on your > communities, even to those folks which are still far from using IPv6, but > who can spare 10 mins to fill this form. > > This survey is focused on metrics we cannot have input without direct > intervention from humans. The outcome of it, plus the data we > periodically collect automatically (from several sources) will be > worked/aggregated and published on http://www.ipv6.eu > > Stay tuned! > > > ps: sorry for any duplicate messages. > > > Best Regards, > > ./Carlos > -------------- > Wide Area Network (WAN) Workgroup, CMF8-RIPE, CF596-ARIN > FCCN - Fundacao para a Computacao Cientifica Nacional http://www.fccn.pt > > "Internet is just routes (191157/571), naming (millions) and... people!" > ********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. From jeroen at unfix.org Tue Sep 5 16:22:42 2006 From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:22:42 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Benchmarking - Sept'2006 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <44FD8832.7010003@unfix.org> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > I'm not sure if this email is relevant for this mail exploder, but despite > that, it seems to be backed up by the European IPv6 Task Force by using the > logo (neither the owner of the logo IPRs), which is not true as the European > IPv6 Task Force members have never been asked about that. One would hope that a site registered by Latif Ladid himself has something to do with the European IPv6 TF. EURid seems to be down, but that name popped up when it was still alive Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 311 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From david.kessens at nokia.com Wed Sep 13 06:41:21 2006 From: david.kessens at nokia.com (David Kessens) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:41:21 -0700 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Call for agenda topics & draft agenda (v1) for ipv6 wg RIPE53 Message-ID: <20060913044121.GA3535@nokia.com> During next RIPE meeting, our working group is scheduled to meet: Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00, Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam I have prepared a draft agenda with all our standard items. However, the meeting will only be a success if we get a lot of active participation from all participants. In fact there is little reason to have a working group meeting scheduled if we don't get other topics than the standard topics. Is there anything that you have been thinking about regarding the deployment of ipv6 in the european region ? It doesn't matter whether it is a brief topic, whether you have slides or simply would like to ask me to find a speaker. Just send me a quick mail! One thing that I personally was thinking about is the expiration of the 6bone address space. Is there anybody who is willing to give us an overview on what happened, and whether there were any positive or negative effects ? Or anybody knows what the vatican is planning to do with their address space ? Thanks! David Kessens --- Draft Agenda (v1) for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE53 When: Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00 Where: Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam A. Administrative stuff - appointment of scribe - agenda bashing - approval of the minutes (David Kessens) B. Quick update from the RIPE NCC regarding ipv6 services (RIPE NCC) C. Global IPv6 routing table status (discussion) (Gert Doering) D. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? (input from the audience) E. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond (input from the audience) Y. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan (input from the audience) Z. AOB --- From iljitsch at muada.com Thu Sep 28 13:15:46 2006 From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:15:46 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Multihoming in IPv6 using PA space Message-ID: <76A5740F-E931-461A-AED6-1BE47B601424@muada.com> [Going out to routing-wg and ipv6-wg, trim as needed in follow-ups] Before the last IETF meeting there was some discussion about the difficulties in multihoming using a prefix out of PA space from an ISP in IPv6. Because many ISPs filter at /32 or /35 in IPv6, the /48s (or /56s) used for multihoming are often filtered out. After some discussion with people from the IETF v6ops wg, I've written the draft mentioned below, outlining the problem and proposing a BGP community to tag the prefixes used for this so they can be un-filtered as needed. Feedback from people involved with and/or an interest in IPv6 routing is highly appreciated. I'd be happy to discuss the draft in either the routing or IPv6 wgs, or talk about it briefly at the end of my IPv6 routing tutorial on wednesday morning. And of course one-on-one in the hallway. The -01 with only minor changes should be up soon, or you can find it at http://www.muada.com/drafts/draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-mhome- community-01.txt Begin forwarded message: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > Title : BGP Community for PA Multihoming > Author(s) : I. van Beijnum > Filename : draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-mhome-community-00.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2006-9-11 > When an organization wants to connect to the internet using two or > more > Internet Service Providers (multihoming), this is usually done by > setting up BGP routing between the organization in question and > each of > its ISPs. For this, the multihomed organization needs a block of > address space. This can either be a provider independent (PI) > address block that belongs to the organization, or a block out of > the provider aggregatable (PA) address space of one its ISPs. > With IPv4, an address block of at least /24 will generally be suitable > for multihoming, whether its origin is PI or PA. However, until now, > ISPs were encouraged to only accept /32 prefixes from IPv6 PA space, > while end-users generally receive a /48. This makes multihoming > with PA > address space in IPv6 very difficult. This memo describes a new > well-known BGP community attribute for tagging prefixes used for > multihoming with PA space in order to facilitate filtering, rather > than > filter based on prefix length alone. > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa- > mhome-community-00.txt From david.kessens at nokia.com Fri Sep 29 08:10:53 2006 From: david.kessens at nokia.com (David Kessens) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:10:53 -0700 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Agenda for ipv6 wg RIPE53 Message-ID: <20060929061052.GA14769@nokia.com> During the next RIPE meeting, our working group is scheduled to meet: Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00, Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam Please see below for the agenda. I believe that we might still have a little bit of time left so we can still consider some last minute contributions. I would also like to point you to various topics during the EOF sessions that are about ipv6 (IPv6 Routing Table, IPv6 in Real Life - Deployment of Popular Servers in IPv6, IPv6 Routing Tutorial, DHCPv6), or that will cover ipv6 in addition to ipv4 (What is Wrong With the DNS?, UMTS/GPRS Systems). Thanks and see you in Amsterdam! David Kessens --- Agenda for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE53 When: Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00 Where: Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam A. Administrative stuff - appointment of scribe - agenda bashing (David Kessens) B. Quick update from the RIPE NCC regarding ipv6 services (RIPE NCC) C. Global IPv6 routing table status (discussion) (Gert Doering) D. Impact of 6bone address space depreciation (discussion - presentations welcome) E. IPv6 Multihoming Solutions (Marla Azinger) F. Proposal for IPv6 Multihoming Using PA Space (Iljitsch van Beijnum) Background reading material: http://www.muada.com/drafts/draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-mhome-community-01.txt G. Impact of ip6.int deprecation (discussion - presentations welcome) H. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? (input from the audience) I. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond (input from the audience) Y. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan (input from the audience) Z. AOB --- From Bernard.Tuy at renater.fr Fri Sep 29 11:53:30 2006 From: Bernard.Tuy at renater.fr (Bernard Tuy) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:53:30 +0200 Subject: [ipv6-wg] Agenda for ipv6 wg RIPE53 In-Reply-To: <20060929061052.GA14769@nokia.com> References: <20060929061052.GA14769@nokia.com> Message-ID: <451CED1A.70605@renater.fr> ====BT: Hi David, I could present a couple of things in the IPv6 wg meeting (we'll see if time is left for that), I'd like just to present, in the AOB part of the agenda, the IPv6 Summit programme in Cannes (french Riviera) next November (cf.:http://www.v6summit.com/home2.htm). 5 mn will be enough for that. Thanx and see you in A'dam next week, Cheers, +Bernard T. --- David Kessens wrote: > During the next RIPE meeting, our working group is scheduled to meet: > > Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00, Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam > > Please see below for the agenda. I believe that we might still have a > little bit of time left so we can still consider some last minute > contributions. > > I would also like to point you to various topics during the > EOF sessions that are about ipv6 (IPv6 Routing Table, IPv6 in Real > Life - Deployment of Popular Servers in IPv6, IPv6 Routing Tutorial, > DHCPv6), or that will cover ipv6 in addition to ipv4 (What is Wrong > With the DNS?, UMTS/GPRS Systems). > > Thanks and see you in Amsterdam! > > David Kessens > --- > > Agenda for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE53 > > When: Wed Oct 4, 17:00-18:00 > Where: Grand Ballroom, Krasnapolsky Hotel, Amsterdam > > A. Administrative stuff > - appointment of scribe > - agenda bashing > (David Kessens) > > B. Quick update from the RIPE NCC regarding ipv6 services > (RIPE NCC) > > C. Global IPv6 routing table status (discussion) > (Gert Doering) > > D. Impact of 6bone address space depreciation > (discussion - presentations welcome) > > E. IPv6 Multihoming Solutions > (Marla Azinger) > > F. Proposal for IPv6 Multihoming Using PA Space > (Iljitsch van Beijnum) > Background reading material: > http://www.muada.com/drafts/draft-van-beijnum-v6ops-pa-mhome-community-01.txt > > G. Impact of ip6.int deprecation > (discussion - presentations welcome) > > H. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? > *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? > (input from the audience) > > I. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond > (input from the audience) > > Y. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan > (input from the audience) > > Z. AOB > --- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4025 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: