[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed Nov 30 18:12:58 CET 2005
> > ISPs do exist for customers, not customers do exist to feed ISPs in the > > most convenient way for the ISPs. Some folks seem to forget that, > > looking at all the discussion trying to ignore the demand for real > > multihoming (and that includes TE and network-wide routing policy > > implementation, neither being delivered by things like shim6). > > BTW... in Germany, the phone operators were forced to implement phone > number portability by law. The regulator didn't care about all the > whining from the telcos about that being impossible, uneconomic, the > world will explode etc. If they manage to get that imposed on the > traditional telcos, I wonder how much easier it will be to do that on > the ISPs. > > > Regards, > Daniel > > -- > CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 why does this remind me of the law passed (in several different jurisdictions, if the urban myths are to be believed) that mandated PI == 3.2. ... legal talent can not change some laws. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]