[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Jørgen Hovland jorgen at hovland.cx
Sun Nov 13 17:22:37 CET 2005
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Hi Wilfried, >From that perspective I seem to see 2 aspects in the recent discussion: > >- you shall not receive address space for builing a service, you are to > buy that from some "big-folk". > > This is an intersting point of view, and taken to the extreme will > make us end up with a _very small_ number of _very big_ entities. > > Traditionally these things were called monopolies. Nothing I would be > too happy to see coming back ;-) > >- there has been th discussion regarding "anycast" but isnt this just > a special(?) case of th PI-topic? You are right; the differences between PI and anycast are few. Perhaps it would be a (good?) idea to merge the anycast and PI discussion into a single discussion instead. > This is an intersting point of view, and taken to the extreme will > make us end up with a _very small_ number of _very big_ entities. Strictly speaking; All you need to do is to create a network and ask for address space. The "anycasters" won't even do that. They want the address space without the network. That is what I don't support. Joergen Hovland
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]