[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] What is a site?
Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Mon May 9 11:37:53 CEST 2005
On 9-mei-2005, at 9:17, Roger Jorgensen wrote: > and the other view: > /60 -> /52 (for networks with no router and networks with one router) Giving a /52 to networks that don't have a router has the potential to burn v6 space rather quickly. (Today those networks would get a /64.) And why would a SOHO (small office, home office) or residential network with just a single router need 4096 subnets (/52) rather than 256 (/56) or 16 (/60)? If they really need that many subnets it's probably better to stick at the current /48 recommendation. Iljitsch -- Iljitsch van Beijnum - http://www.bgpexpert.com/ (updated: May 6, 22:39:15)
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]