[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hph at oslo.net
Tue Jul 19 13:38:32 CEST 2005
Jeroen Massar wrote: > >Except that these are bound to be announced separately. >Getting a block from ARIN, one from RIPE and one from APNIC seems >plausible to me, but getting a block for every country one is in defeats >the whole aggregation idea. > I dont really se what the benefit of getting different blocks from dfferent RIRs have. I get one single block I have the choice of announcing it as one prefix or as multiple prefixes. If I get multiple blocks I only have the choice of annoincing it as multiple prefixes. -hph
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Allocation behaviour (organisations getting multiple /32's)]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]