[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent Gillet
vgi at zoreil.com
Mon Jan 17 15:25:21 CET 2005
dr at cluenet.de disait : > On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:00:34AM +0100, Vincent Gillet wrote: > > > The RIPE NCC received the IPv6 address range 2003:0000::/18 > > > from the IANA in January 2005. > > > > Yep, and 50% of this allocation as already been allocated to one LIR. > > > > I am not used to see 50% of IANA block allocated to LIR, but i > > assume that it is new address-policy rules i was not aware of ! > > Those are in place since longer. Take customer count and HD-Ratio > and do the maths. It's simple, and DTAG would probably have qualified > for more if they really wanted. > > France Telecom has a couple of million customers too I guess. A > /20 can be justified by approx. 3.2 million, a /19 needs ~5.5mio. I am ok this the size /whatever. My concern is the difference about /18 allocation from IANA versus /19 allocation to LIR thus a 50% immediate usage. If France Telecom get a /19 too, it is full ==> . Ripe would request another block to IANA, . adminitrative work, . need to notify LIRs about this new block .... . need to update filters oncemore, .... I am more concerned with Operations. Update filtering is part of my job. Vincent.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]