[ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Dec 6 20:53:36 CET 2005
Hi, On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:08:47AM -0500, peter.sherbin at bell.ca wrote: > Get rid of the current hierarchy which requires ISP in order to > connect to the network. The Internet is an aggregation of interconnected > networks. We want to replicate what the Mother Nature has already > given us, i.e. a brain like structure where neurons (individual > networks) have multiple direct connections with each other. As brain > cells networks should have about the same size. Network prefix > determines the size. Ah, back to the source-route-bridged times of (ring-) explorer packets... Sounds like a nice idea, would even be much more resilient than the current structure. Any IETF proposals where we can read up on how this is gonna work? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]