[ipv6-wg] a consensus, about what?

took me the liberty to change the subject line yet again...

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Gert Doering wrote:
<snip>
> Unlike some other participants on this list, I'm actually aiming for
> something that could reach consensus.
> 
> Otherwise, all this is wasted time, and we could directly go to ITU and
> ask them to fix the Internet.

After this quite long but interesting discussion on the two working group 
mailing lists involved I guess the above sums it up quite well, where do we 
want to go tomorrow and the day after tomorrow? The future of Internet to 
put it short... and I'm not sure any of the above are the right place for 
that discussion.

so what sort of consensus are we aiming for, and about what? A new policy 
for AS, a net block, routing policy, multihoming, or just IPv6 in general? 
This entire discussion have been sidetracked alot, not a bad thing either, 
quite alot of topics have been discussed and interesting thoughts brought 
forward.. but what are our goal with all this?



-- 

------------------------------
Roger Jorgensen              |
rogerj at stud.cs.uit.no        | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no      | roger at jorgensen.no
-------------------------------------------------------