[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Morgado
chbm at chbm.net
Sat Dec 3 00:35:04 CET 2005
On 18 Nov 2005 15:44:20, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carsten Schiefner: > > > of course, I can't speak for every DNS operator, but DENIC denying the > > transfer of the .de zone has no other reason than data protection, ie. > > making the harvesting of contact data of some 9 million plus domain name > > holders by just piping the zone through the whois impossible. > > Your claim is absurd. The real privacy issue comes form forced > publication of WHOIS data. As a member of the DENIC executive board, > you certainly know that, so please stop spreading such misinformation. > No, your "get back our stuff on edonkey" plan is absurd. Next time could you please make your idea a little bit funny so we can all have a laugh ? Thank you. -- Carlos Morgado - chbm(a)ma.ssive.net - http://chbm.net/0x1FC57F0A FP:0A27 35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]