[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Fri Dec 2 10:34:10 CET 2005
> You need a /28 and want "Provider Independence". I use a /28 at home. Hope you do not host thousands of websites at home ;) > Lets say that I want "PI" too, that would mean I am going to get, pay > for and maintain: > - Multiple Redundant Routers > - Multiple Redundant Links > - Multiple Redundant Transits > - Own 24/7 NOC (things will fail) > - and a lot more... > > You are willing to do and pay for all that, but don't want to become an > LIR? In this example I'm providing hosting and no more than hosting. No telecoms, no transit channels, no ADSL. May be domain registration. To make that business success I need to be multihomed (no objections at this point, I think?). Also I need to be independent from carriers (especially when hosting grows up and I will ask for money for direct peering with me). But I do NOT need a lot of address space (thanks God and RFC, we have HTTP/1.1 this time). Look more. http://www.ripe.net/membership/benefits.html As a hosting provider, I do NOT want any of that services. So no reasons to be LIR, isn't it? It is only example for PI, but many other exists. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]