[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Mon Sep 13 01:04:23 CEST 2004
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:07:22PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Sending *unsolicited* automatic reports to *multiple* mailing lists > is considered bad netiquette. And forwarding private email conversation to public mailinglists without asking correspondees permission is not considered bad netiquette? Double standards? > In your case even more so since similar and better defined reports > are available on demand from more than one source. Obviously those have NOT lead to getting problems fixed. I was SHOCKED about the ugly state of those vital infrastructure zones when I did the first survey. > It would have been more acceptable to say something like: > "Hey, I have made this useful report. What do you think about it? > If you are interested you can subscribe to regular reports here." That makes it easy to ignore the problems, eh? See my other mail where I compare with the CIDR report. > These days netiquette is violated so frequently that most people > do not even care to point things out to violators; > they just ignore messages from people who do not behave socially. > Procmail is an easy tool. Feel free to procmail me away. > [I spent 6 minutes composing this message. Multiply by n>20 / day] You've decided for yourself how much you expose yourself to public communication. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]