[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Thu Sep 9 09:11:20 CEST 2004
On 08.09 18:09, Jeroen Massar wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 17:07, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > Since a storm seems to be rising about this > > and it threatens to leave the tea cup here > > is some perspective. > > Which book is that from? My own ;-). > I really can't call it spam ... A matter of definition. Maybe I was a bit harsh using the word spam. My feeble excuse for being harsher than usual is that <rant> I returned from holidays recently found my daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net mailbox had grown about 3000 messages **each day**. Also the spam-filtering of the NCC was not only letting about 10% of it through but was also starting to generate false positives. This SPAM filtering is maintained by competent professionals, and *still* I have to resort to personal whitelisting now and spend significant amout of time to weed out messages which I do not want. </rant> Daniel sent these messages to multiple mailing lists and he did not take the hint when his messages were not re-distributed to nanog; instead he sent them twice with different message-ids, causing the messages to land in my mailbox twice. So I decided to give him another hint, he took it as an official request, and the storm-in-a-teacup started. > ... > Which sources may that be that report about nameservers? > (There is unfortunatly no IPv6-wg resource page and google can't > seem to find them for me either) google(dns delegation check) does it for me. The fourth hit is for http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/dns/r45-minutes.html Check out agenda point F. There are tools available with well defined and discussed methodologies. > Next to that, it is quite apparent that the operator(s) in question > are not really watching their own infrastructure, which is basically > their work, at all.... that gives one to wonder... I agree. But why do regular messages about this belong into the mailbox of all subscribers of all the lists Daniel posts to? > > It would have been more acceptable to say something like: > > "Hey, I have made this useful report. What do you think about it? > > If you are interested you can subscribe to regular reports here." > > Indeed, where can I request to signup for this as I think it is very > useful .... Daniel? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] DNS Weather Report 2004-09-07
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]