[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Mon Jun 21 10:01:03 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-21, at 09.34, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > I guess if the RFC is there is because IANA requires it, so moving > this to historic will not work, instead updating it will do. Help me out here. Why would IANA require it? I don't remember there being an RFC telling IANA how to allocate other resources? What's so special about IPv6 addresses? - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQNaVwqarNKXTPFCVEQJrbwCgjpe67yC7v0iD6eEYGyDAUwPI3GoAoIaO mYXgpaVzzofUkOMR/r+oElDC =NOOE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]