[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Jul 22 10:55:22 CEST 2004
On 22-jul-04, at 9:58, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: >> But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone >> for me. > I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two > reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve. Blame the IAB. Apparently, they were the ones who created this mess by frivolously adopting ip6.arpa as a replacement for ip6.int. It staggers the mind that otherwise smart people can make decisions like this. In Dutch we have a saying "those who burn their buttocks must sit on the blisters" (= if you do something stupid you have to suffer the consequences).
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]