[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu Jul 22 09:58:31 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-07-22, at 09.43, Jeroen Massar wrote: > But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone > for me. I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQP9zq6arNKXTPFCVEQI3kACgg64aymyVhewNR5xZqxBqyf+eeZMAoIgM 8UGVR6tAuhsVPUBZQOJSCxqc =y9eV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]