[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Dec 16 15:20:54 CET 2003
On 16-dec-03, at 12:06, jfcm wrote: > I suggest ISO should define an international trans network numbering > scheme that could be adopted as the IPv6.010 numbering plan, the same > way as the ccTLD list is the ISO 3166 2 letters list, and IDNA uses > unicodes etc. The ISO is already in charge of NSAP addresses. I don't see how importing the complexity that exists there into IP is going to help us. > This would relieve IETF from these user, political, etc. oriented > inapropriate controversies. There is very little, if any, controversy in IPv6 addressing. Ask for address space and you'll get it. Moving addressing issues to a new organization would in fact create controversy as it is virtually guaranteed that address policies and routing policies will fall out of alignment, to the detriment of the net as a whole.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]