[iot-wg] [BCOP] Adressing Thread & Matter for IoT
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [BCOP] Adressing Thread & Matter for IoT
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] work on revised IoT BCOP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Poonam Yadav
poonam.hiwal at gmail.com
Wed Mar 8 14:12:30 CET 2023
Hi Peter, I would be happy to volunteer myself for discussion on this topic. Best, Poonam On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 12:40 PM Peter Steinhäuser <ps at embedd.com> wrote: > Dear collegues, > > since the IoT WG released it's first BCOP document [1] some time has > passed. Several technologies discussed in the document – i.e. DPP, USP – > have become mandatory for large carriers and can be found the majority of > their roadmaps. The considerations regarding secure onboarding can also be > found in works of other researchers and became common ground – I think this > document was a good and useful first step, but technologies are evolving > and new options and requirements surface. > > Recent talks with carriers revealed that all intend to increase their > efforts in managing IoT devices in their customer's homes or start such > efforts. All of them refer to Thread [2] and Matter [3] as the technologies > of choice – which makes sense given that at these standards increase > compatibility and are backed up by large players like Google, Amazon & > Apple. Since Thread is based upon IPv6 it offers new options and > possibilities to integrate with existing network infrastructure an > standards. Nevetheless it also requires re-evaluation of threats and attack > vectors in such networks. > > I would like to initiate work on a follow-up BCOP document that centers > around the changes Thread and Matter do introduce to networks, but that > also takes into account our findings that got incorporated into the fist > BCOP document this WG has released. Especially the challenges regarding > onboarding and security in general remain the same and would be needed to > be evaluated in regards to the new technologies. > > An IPv6 based IoT networking protocol offers also new possibilities for > integrating IoT devices into networks and can change the way we look at > such networks. This should also be part of such a document. > > I would like to ask the members of this WG about their opinion about these > considerations. And I also want to ask for volunteers to work an such a new > BCOP document and would be glad to initiate and manage the process. > > Sincerely, > Peter > > [1] https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-759 > [2] https://openthread.io/guides/thread-primer > [3] https://csa-iot.org/all-solutions/matter/ > *Peter Steinhäuser, CEO* > embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland > Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64 > > > _______________________________________________ > iot-wg mailing list > iot-wg at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20230308/a6636f28/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [BCOP] Adressing Thread & Matter for IoT
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] work on revised IoT BCOP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]