[iot-wg] the vague IoT/RIPE-NCC training question
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] the vague IoT/RIPE-NCC training question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Tue May 31 19:45:51 CEST 2022
sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan at afnic.fr> wrote: > In addition to security, IMHO RIPE-NCC could focus on the identifiers (Naming > & addressing) side of IoT for training. For example, the usage of IPv6 for > IoT devices. That seems far too researchy to me. It seems like it might be something this WG could discuss, and maybe even do some kind of document. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 515 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220531/db557c7c/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] the vague IoT/RIPE-NCC training question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]