[iot-wg] Call for volunteers or nominations for RIPE IoT Working Group co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Call for volunteers or nominations for RIPE IoT Working Group co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] IoT WG co-chair criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Wed Apr 13 20:58:44 CEST 2022
sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan at afnic.fr> wrote: > As Constanze's term as IoT WG co-chair is about to end with RIPE 84, > this is a call for nominations or volunteers to co-chair the RIPE IoT > working group. > *********************************************************************** > Please DO NOT reply to this message if you wish to propose a volunteer. > *********************************************************************** Hi, I am replying with meta-questions/suggestions. > I would ask for each candidate to start a new thread with, e.g., > "[name] for co-chair", and for members to utter their support by > replying to the respective thread. I went to read the IoT WG charter wondering what it was we were supposed to be doing in the first place :-) https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/active-wg/iot says: The Internet of Things (IoT) Working Group will operate under the following charter: (1) To discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for the RIPE community (2) To serve as a focal point for the RIPE NCC regarding community input to their IoT activities, including liaisons with other organisations (3) To invite IoT communities for a dialogue on matters of operational relevance, including security, the numbering system, and applicability of standards (4) To develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters {I numbered the points} I think that we've done a small bit of (4). I don't think that we've done (2) at all. On (1) and (3) we've done bit and pieces. I bring this up because I won't really know who a good co-chair is until I have a better idea what we are doing. Or to put it another way, maybe candidates could also say what they would do this way. I also wonder about whether physical attendance at RIPE meetings is a MUST, or just a WOULD BE NICE, and whether participants from outside the RIPE region are appropriate. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 515 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220413/21c5117a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Call for volunteers or nominations for RIPE IoT Working Group co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] IoT WG co-chair criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]